Proposed PRO unit · Purpose-bound prospecting

1. Define question and scope

The project decides which drafts might be prepared for a specific purpose:answering catalog inquiries or catalog news where the case explicitly records that permission. It does not acquire customers or send campaigns. A known source is not permission, and generic consent does not establish compatibility with every purpose.

FPR has eight rows and seven distinct IDs. Rows document fictional source events without names, email, phones, locations or personal attributes. Infer no purchasing capacity, age or interest from missing data. This is a permission-scope decision, not a score of people.

Activity:define source, purpose, permission, version, decision and next review. State three excluded actions and acceptable case evidence.

2. Apply rules before prioritizing

Read permission and purpose before proposing text. P01 permits an inquiry-response draft;P06 only the requested follow-up to that inquiry. P02 permits preparing a catalog-news draft for that purpose. None authorizes automatic sending;there are no operational tools or actual human review in this project.

P03 lacks evidence;P04 withdrew permission;P05 has a different purpose;P08 comes from a scraped list without permission. Stop those actions. Do not request permission by sending the very unauthorized message you intended to avoid. Stopped does not mean commercial rejection or a low-quality person.

Activity:classify eight rows as inquiry draft, specific promotional draft, stop or duplicate. Record rule and evidence. Add no actual contacts or invented sending intervals.

3. Handle repetition, withdrawal and versions

F07 repeats P02 v1from F02. A copy adds no permission or second opportunity. Preserve both source references without counting twice. This example has no durable storage or cross-application deduplication, only a reviewable local matrix.

Complete separate variant VPR:an authorized fictional source adds P02 v2with withdrawn catalog-news permission. The exercise explicitly makes v2current;v1remains history, not current permission. The promotional draft is no longer a candidate. Invent no previous sending or real deletion.

Activity:record F02/F07 as one decision and apply VPR to a separate copy. State changes and invariants. Design a conflict without authoritative version and explain why it stops.

4. Propose acquisition without purchases or contact

An acquisition proposal may describe voluntary information, its intended question and an explicit purpose choice. That establishes no live page, sign-up or sales. Create no actual forms, advertising accounts or campaigns in this unit.

Practice counts:8 rows,7 unique IDs,1duplicate,2 inquiry IDs,1 promotional,4 stopped. The3/7≈42.9%ratio describes draft classification, not conversion, profit or acquisition. VPR becomes2/7≈28.6%;the change reflects permission, not falling sales.

Activity:deliver matrix, P01 reply draft, P02 promotional draft labeled do not send, proposed purpose notice and five tests:missing permission, withdrawal, different purpose, duplicate, conflicting version. The notice is a proposal, not collected real consent.

Local resources

• Fictional source
• Decisions and traceability
• Exception tests
• Self-review without threshold
• Project workbook