Month 10 · Integrate a small reversible project
Four relative self-study weeks and one monthly project. Entirely fictional local manual practice; no connected accounts,payments or automatic sends.
This is the developed Month 10 learning resource, not the entire twelve-month course. The four exercises form one monthly activity M10. Reading, personal marks and self-scores do not verify academic completion.
Complete fictional source F10 and requests S10
Product sheet F10:N01 notebook COP 8000;L01 pencil COP 1200;C01 folder COP 2500. Stock,delivery and contacts are unknown. S10 consists of exactly these five unique requests:
| ID | Reference | Quantity | Source status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q01 | N01 | 2 | Requested only |
| Q02 | L01 | 3 | Requested only |
| Q03 | C01 | Missing | Clarification needed |
| Q04 | X99 | 1 | Unknown product |
| Q05 | C01 | 2 | Requested only |
Complete separate variant V10:all S10 unchanged except Q03 quantity4. X99 remains unknown. Four deliverables only:sheet,register,checklist,two replies. All are fictional local drafts,not a production integration.
Week 1 · Scope a reversible project
Goal: Define problem, boundaries and verifiable deliverables.
The case problem is organizing requests for three products without losing unknowns or claiming actions. A reproducible sheet and manual process are valid learning solutions; they need not look connected. Specify input,review and output. A diagram or table does not demonstrate operational integration.
The case scope contains four deliverables: product sheet,five-request register,checklist and two replies. All must use F10 codes consistently. Payments,automatic sends,account access,reservations and actual inventory changes are excluded. Adding those claims does not make the project more complete.
Reversibility means preserving sources and copies,identifying changes and demonstrating without external actions. Keep initial and revised versions. If a missing quantity is clarified,use a separate variant instead of rewriting the original as complete. No personal data is necessary.
Case for review
A plan opens a business account and sends messages to demonstrate organization.
Your activity
Replace it with problem,inputs,four deliverables,boundaries and acceptance evidence. Name local copies F10,RegisterD1,ChecklistD1 and RepliesD1. List prohibited actions.
Worked feedback — compare after trying
A manual walkthrough of five requests and expected outcomes suffices. Open no accounts,pay,send,reserve or change stock. Acceptance checks consistent codes,two exceptions and traceability,not a live service.
Supporting artifact 1: scope contract and evidence plan.
Week 2 · Build consistent source and register
Goal: Keep stable codes and explicit exceptions.
F10 lists N01 notebook atCOP 8000,L01 pencil atCOP 1200 and C01 folder atCOP 2500. Stock and delivery are unknown. These fictional prices are not an APEX catalog. A calculable request would still require review before any real order confirmation.
S10 has five unique IDs. Q01 requests2N01;Q02 requests3L01;Q03 requests C01 without quantity;Q04 requests1X99,an unknown reference;Q05 requests2C01. Missing quantity is not zero. Do not replace X99 with a similar product;clarification is required. Preserve the input even when calculation is impossible.
Use ID,reference,quantity,source,status,subtotal and pending-review columns. Product subtotal excludes delivery and confirms no stock. Distinguish calculable from uncalculable entries. The sum of three calculable requests is neither sales nor the total value of all five.
Case for review
A register fills Q03 with1 and changes X99 toN01 to calculate every row.
Your activity
Copy all five requests,identify exceptions and calculate Q01,Q02,Q05 only. Add evidence for every decision and preserve F10.
Worked feedback — compare after trying
Q01:2×8000=COP 16000;Q02:3×1200=COP 3,600;Q05:2×2500=COP 5,000. Q03 cannot be calculated without quantity;Q04 cannot be calculated without a known reference. The three known subtotals sum toCOP 24600,partial test amounts only,no confirmed orders.
Supporting artifact 2: F10 and traceable five-request register.
Week 3 · Build checklist and two replies
Goal: Apply consistent rules to different outputs.
Useful checks are observable:unique ID,known reference,positive integer quantity,source price,correct calculation and stock/delivery limits. A checked box without evidence proves nothing. Define the failure response for each check:stop and clarify when necessary.
Write two replies for different needs. Q01 can show a conditional subtotal and unknowns. Q03 needs quantity clarification first. Polite language must not hide missing data or claim someone checked stock or assigned delivery.
No channel,contact or send permission is supplied. Keep replies locally and label them fictional drafts. No AI call or real operations panel is required. Review language manually by tracing each claim to F10 and S10.
Case for review
Q03 receives “Your folder is confirmed atCOP 2500” while all checklist items appear approved.
Your activity
Create six evidence-based checks with failure outcomes. Draft Q01 andQ03 in at most three sentences each. Identify verbs implying unexecuted actions.
Worked feedback — compare after trying
Q01 example:“Two N01 would subtotalCOP 16000 from F10. Stock and delivery remain unknown. No order is confirmed.” Q03 example:“F10 contains C01,but the requested quantity is missing. How many units are needed in this fictional case? No subtotal or confirmation yet.” Q03 fails quantity validation,not a blanket approval.
Supporting artifact 3: failure-aware checklist and two consistent drafts.
Week 4 · Run a manual demo and assemble M10
Goal: Test the project without calling it production software.
A manual demo traces input,review,output and evidence for each ID. Compare expected and observed results without inventing a server. An uncalculable input that produces a number fails even when other replies are correct. Document corrections and repeat affected checks.
Use separate variant V10:Q03 receives quantity4 while X99 remains undefined. Q03 then gives4×2500=COP 10000,without confirming stock. Q04 remains uncalculable. Never replace S10 withV10 or count both as new requests. Identify which version was used.
Combine four supporting artifacts into one M10. Approved rubric v1:facts/sources,artifact/process,data/human review and reasoning/limits;each 0–2. Zero absent/wrong,one partial,two sufficiently justified. Minimum 6/8 without zeros requires authorized human review. Passing a manual demo issues no statement,enrollment or benefits.
Case for review
A report calls CSV files and manual drafts a “connected platform ready for use”.
Your activity
Walk through five requests and V10. Attach test matrix and two documented corrections. Describe the project honestly and score criteria with evidence references.
Worked feedback — compare after trying
Valid description:“Local manual project organizing five fictional requests,with three calculable subtotals and two clarification cases.” V10 allows Q03 COP 10000 but not Q04. No connected system,reservations,payments or sends. A 6/8 without zeros may be reviewed;6/8 with zero fails. Other months and final portfolio remain separate.
Single M10 submission:four consistent deliverables,manual demo,tests and justified self-review.
Assemble your single monthly package
Download M10 package guide (TXT)
Keep your work locally. Formal review requires actual artifacts and an authorized human reviewer. No certificate, enrollment or benefit is issued by this page. The other eleven months and final portfolio remain separate parts of the annual program.
Optional AI tutor — read consent and limits first · My personal study marks, not academic verification