APEX · Editorial proposal

Español

Proposed PRO unit · Evidence-based inventory and suppliers

Advanced editorial proposal for master 5.2 inventory, orders and suppliers. Not a complete program, commercial offer or approved PRO assessment. Entirely fictional: no purchases, contacts, actual prices or connections.

FIP · Complete fictional source
FieldValueDefinition
Product / ProductoK01One fictional item / Un artículo ficticio
Recorded units / Registradas20Reference ledger / Registro referencia
Reserved units / Reservadas6Included in 20 / Incluidas en 20
Held units / Retenidas2Included in 20; separate from reserved / Incluidas en 20; distintas de reservadas
Requested units / Solicitadas15Not accepted order / No pedido aceptado
Supplier A / Proveedor A10 available; minimum 5Declared only; lead unknown / Solo declarado; plazo desconocido
Supplier B / Proveedor B8 available; minimum 10Contradiction needs review / Contradicción por revisar
Supplier C / Proveedor CAvailability unknown; minimum 1Reference lead 2 days, not confirmed / Plazo referencia 2 días, no confirmado

1. Define units and states before subtraction

FIP records 20K01units. Six reserved and two held units are included in 20 and are separate groups. Reference availability is 20−6−2=12, not verified current commercial availability. Never subtract reservations again if already excluded: source definitions matter.

A 15 unit request is not an accepted order.15−12=3 is a reference gap, not an automatic replenishment order. Real quality, location, cutoff time and synchronization are unknown. The case table is the only exercise source.

Activity: define recorded, reserved, held, reference available and requested. State units, relationships and evidence. Calculate availability and gap without deciding to buy.

Worked feedback

Feedback:12 reference available, gap 3. Recorded 20 does not mean 20 free. Held means neither available nor proven permanent loss; invent no cause. No sale, actual reservation or delivery commitment is confirmed.

2. Review supplier information without selecting by appearance

Adeclares 10 available, minimum 5, no lead time. Bdeclares 8 but minimum 10; the sheet cannot establish fulfillment. Chas unknown availability, minimum 1 and a reference 2 day lead, not confirmed. No prices, names, contacts or contractual terms are supplied.

Separate data consistency from suitability. Gap 3 alone does not meet Aminimum 5, but creates no obligation to purchase 5 or hold surplus. Acommercial minimum is not stock evidence. Select no supplier from incomplete data.

Activity: record declarations, missing evidence, contradictions and questions for authorized review. Keep price, quality, timing and buying authority unresolved. Prepare no order and contact nobody.

Worked feedback

Feedback: Aneeds lead-time and minimum relevance clarification; Bneeds reconciliation of 8 available/min 10; Cneeds stock and timing verification. Two reference days establish no promised date. All remain subject to review, not supplier ranking or purchasing advice.

3. Reconcile discrepancies and preserve versions

Complete V1changes physical count to 18 instead of 20; reserved 6 and held 2 stay fixed. Ledger 20 minuscount 18 is a 2 unit discrepancy to investigate. Reference available 18−6−2=10, gap 15−10=5. Infer no loss, theft or sale.

Separate complete V2keeps ledger 20, changes reserved to 8, held 2, request 15. Available 10, gap 5. Never combine V1/V2: they are independent tests. Combining would produce 8 available/gap 7 from an unsupplied source.

Activity: keep base, V1, V2separate and record source, version, difference, pending item and next check. Design an overlapping reserved/held case and explain why clarification is required.

Worked feedback

Feedback: base 12/gap 3;V1andV2each 10/gap 5. Divergent counts require source review, not blind adjustment. Overlapping states risk double subtraction; stop until overlap is known. No actual inventory changes.

4. Deliver a reversible review procedure

A local procedure can follow source→validate units/states→calculate reference→review discrepancy→propose human clarification. A checked box proves no purchase or receipt. Operational permissions, current sources and concurrency need authorized integration, not implemented here.

Prepare five tests: base, count difference, reservation change, overlapping states and contradictory supplier data. Record expected, observed and limits. Preserve unknowns instead of turning declared availability into received goods.

Activity: deliver dictionary, supplier matrix, variant reconciliation, checklist and human-review note. Propose a local clarification draft without an actual recipient. Approve no purchases, payments or orders.

Worked feedback

Feedback: self-review four aspects 0–2: source/states, calculation/variants, data/permissions, reasoning/limits. No approved PRO threshold, completion, statement or benefit. This checks a fictional example, not a real warehouse or complete PRO curriculum.

Local resources