| Source | Observation | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| FOP-1 | 10 fictional observation notes /10 notas ficticias | Not unique people or market sample / No personas únicas ni muestra de mercado |
| FOP-2 | 6 notes mention missing catalog details /6 notas sobre detalles de catálogo | May overlap other labels / Etiquetas pueden solaparse |
| FOP-3 | 4 notes mention appointment status /4 notas sobre estado de cita | 2 also mention catalog /2 también mencionan catálogo |
| FOP-4 | No acquisition-effect evidence / Sin evidencia de captación | Unknown, not zero demand / Desconocido, no demanda cero |
| FOP-5 | Local prototype resources / Recursos prototipo local | Text editor, fictional product sheet, no connected tools / Editor, ficha ficticia, sin herramientas conectadas |
| FOP-6 | Product sheet / Ficha producto | N01notebook;L01pencil;C01folder; no prices, stock or delivery / N01cuaderno;L01lápiz;C01carpeta; sin precios, existencia o entrega |
| FOP-7 | Schedule source / Fuente agenda | Not supplied / No aportada |
| FOP-8 | Business results / Resultados comerciales | No sales, customers, investment or revenue data / Sin ventas, clientes, inversión o ingresos |
Complete note labels:O01–O04 catalog only;O05–O06 both;O07–O08 appointment only;O09–O10 neither. Labels are supplied fictional classifications, not independently collected observations.
1. Separate observations from opportunities
FOPsupplies ten fictional notes, not ten people or a market survey. Six mention missing catalog detail, four appointment status and two have both labels. Observations suggest exploration, not proven demand, willingness to pay or profit.
Three hypotheses: HAclearer catalog sheet; HBappointment-status explanation; HCacquisition campaign. These are proposals, not existing services. No HCeffect evidence is supplied. Missing evidence is not zero demand; invent no testimonials.
Activity: write each hypothesis with assumed problem, available evidence and unknowns. State unsupported market, customer and revenue claims.
Worked feedback
Feedback: HArelates to 6 notes, HBto 4, HCwithout effect evidence. No buying rate, market size or guaranteed interest. A clarity issue may justify a document test, not a recommendation to launch a business.
2. Count overlap and evaluate evidence
Six plus four gives ten label assignments, but two notes carry both. Union 6+4−2=8 notes; two carry neither label. Do not count ten distinct needs or people.
In this set,6/10=60%mention catalog,4/10=40%appointments,2/10=20%overlap. These are fictional-note percentages, not market preferences or success probabilities. Generalize to no country, neighborhood or sector.
Activity: tabulate labels, counts, denominator, overlap and limits. Propose a minimal aggregate classification record; collect no real data or names.
Worked feedback
Feedback: eight with at least one label, two with neither; six catalog, four appointments, two both. Arithmetic consistency does not validate observation quality. Note definition, collection method, period and representativeness remain unknown.
3. Compare test feasibility, not profitability
Resources are a local editor and three-product fictional sheet, no prices, stock or delivery. No schedule or connected tools. HAallows a local text prototype. HBneeds a status source first. HCneeds measurement design and authorization before any campaign.
Choosing HAfor clarity practice is a bounded learning decision, not ranking business profitability. Assign no return, financial-risk or personal-quality scores from this source. Mark proposals locally testable, blocked by missing input or lacking design.
Activity: matrix evidence, dependencies, resources, possible test and limits for HA/HB/HC. Define observable HAclarity without real users or a budget.
Worked feedback
Feedback: HAchecks that the document identifies code/product without implying price/stock; HBawaits schedule source; HChas no effect evidence/design. Launch nothing or claim success. Without an actual reviewer, this remains self-inspection, not user validation.
4. Build a reversible test and bounded decision
HAprototype: three lines, N01notebook, L01pencil, C01folder, plus “prices, stock and delivery unspecified”. Ask which code is pencil and whether delivery can be confirmed. Expected:L01and no. This tests the material, not a market.
Complete VOPvariant removes the notice and adds “delivery tomorrow”. It fails unsupported-claim review. Removing that promise and restoring the notice corrects the prototype, not proves demand or revenue. Preserve before/after and limits. No contacts, purchases, accounts or investment.
Activity: deliver hypothesis log, count table, feasibility matrix and prototype with two questions plus VOP. Decide “explore further/pause for data/not tested” from evidence, not “winning business”. Self-review source, arithmetic, test design and limits 0–2 with no approved PRO threshold.
Worked feedback
Feedback: HAclarity can be explored locally; HBawaits source; HCis untested. Claim no customers acquired, commercial viability or financial recommendation. No checklist issues statements, benefits or enrollment. This proposed unit neither completes nor approves all PRO.